The judge ruled that the new book infringed the copyright of the original novel’s author, J.D. Salinger, rejecting claims that 60 Years Later: Coming Through the Rye was transformative and thus a fair use of Salinger’s original work.
The judge said the new book simply rehashed themes of the original, and did not qualify for the “parody” copyright exception, which has been successfully utilized by books such as The Wind Done Gone, which was found to be a true parody of the original novel Gone With the Wind.
Could it be that the attempted Catcher parody was seen, as Holden Caufield might have said, as being a trifle “phony?”
- Bill Rogers, Student-at-Law, Toronto
Visit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net
EMPLOYMENT LAW • CIVIL LITIGATION • WILLS AND ESTATES • FAMILY LAW & DIVORCE
ORIGINALLY POSTED AT WISE LAW BLOG • SUBSCRIBE TO WISE LAW BLOG
No comments:
Post a Comment
Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post here. Comments are subject to the site's terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of Wise Law Blog and the writers thereof. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed without notification.