Friday, April 30, 2010

Courts, Cameras and 1152 Years in Prison

Really? I don't usually disagree with Talk Left's Jaralyn Merritt, but she loses me with this comment on a Denver sentencing hearing:

Forcing a defendant to be on television is wrong. Cameras in the courtroom should be allowed only if the defendant consents.

If there is any right to cameras in courtrooms, that right surely belongs to the public, rather than criminally-charged defendants - especially convicted ones.

The balance of her post, which addresses the absurdity of sentencing anyone to 1,152 years in prison, is bang-on, however.

- Garry J. Wise, Toronto

Visit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net

EMPLOYMENT LAWCIVIL LITIGATIONWILLS AND ESTATESFAMILY LAW & DIVORCE

ORIGINALLY POSTED AT WISE LAW BLOGSUBSCRIBE TO WISE LAW BLOG

No comments:

Post a Comment

Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post here. Comments are subject to the site's terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of Wise Law Blog and the writers thereof. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed without notification.