Apparently so, according to a Law Society of Upper Canada bulletin, emailed to members early Tuesday morning. The notice is strangely veiled as to the nature of the motion itself:
The members who filed a motion to be made at the Law Society's Annual General Meeting on May 5, 2010 (published in the April 16, 2010 edition of the Ontario Reports) have advised the Law Society that the motion will not be moved at the Annual General Meeting.
Pursuant to the by-laws, the motion will therefore not be on the agenda of the Annual General Meeting.
There must be an interesting story here...
For background, see our post last week, Ontario Paralegals and Family Court Representation
- Garry J. Wise, Toronto
Update:
The Toronto Star adds this brief snippet:
The motion, however, has been withdrawn. Toronto paralegal Marshall Yarmus said they have decided instead to allow the law society’s paralegal standing committee to study, on its own timetable, the issue of expanding the scope of practice for paralegals.
The law society has regulated paralegals since 2007. How that development has affected paralegals and the public will be the subject of a review to be submitted to Ontario’s attorney general in 2012.
- GJW
Visit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net
EMPLOYMENT LAW • CIVIL LITIGATION • WILLS AND ESTATES • FAMILY LAW & DIVORCE
ORIGINALLY POSTED AT WISE LAW BLOG • SUBSCRIBE TO WISE LAW BLOG
No comments:
Post a Comment
Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post here. Comments are subject to the site's terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of Wise Law Blog and the writers thereof. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed without notification.