Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Wednesday, June 12, 2013:- Ethics: Lawyer Has Professional Duty to Know Tech
- ABA - Formal Opinion on Judges' Use of Social Media
- 282 current and former female mounties join RCMP sexual harassment class-action lawsuit
- Prosecutors ask French court to drop pimping charges against Dominique Strauss-Kahn
- EU wants privacy guarantees from U.S. amid PRISM crisis
- SCC hearing on Thursday: Sex work, security of the person and the Supreme Court of Canada | Toronto Star
- SCC: Can Law Prohibit Union from Recording and Publishing Names, Images of People Who Cross Picket Lines?
- CBA National: Technology and Law (video featuring @OmarHaRedeye
- Former BigLaw partner: I faced ‘incredible obstacles’ that male lawyers didn’t have to deal with
- ACLU challenges NSA surveillance measures
- Law Society Proceedings to May 31, 2013 - Press Release
- Disbelieved and accused of making a false rape report, now-vindicated victim sues
- Google Seeks Permission to Publish Number of NSA Requests
- Duty to mitigate is alive and well in B.C.
- Is mandatory reporting of security breaches in Canada on its way?
- Mere smell of marijuana was not enough: City of Halifax employee was entitled to refuse drug test
- Glendale officials deny Phoenix Coyote meetings broke state open meeting law - Times Union
- Ikea monkey's fate now in judge's hands
- Tips for the Legal Procrastinator
- PRISM: For web users around the world, everything is different now
- Privacy, Shmrivacy | THE TRIAL WARRIOR BLOG via Antonin I. Pribetic
- Paralegal primer for taking affidavits: All licensed Ontario paralegals designated as commissioners, effective July 1
- Rachel Spence, Law Clerk
Visit our Toronto Law Office website: www.wiselaw.net
No comments:
Post a Comment
Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post here. Comments are subject to the site's terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of Wise Law Blog and the writers thereof. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed without notification.