Ontario Superior Court Justice Graeme Mew addresses yet another access to justice "elephant in the room," in a ruling awarding modest damages of only $10,000 for defamation, after a six-year legal battle between two, rival Toronto weight-loss physicians:
It is for others to decide whether the substantial public resources that have been made available to enable this dispute to be adjudicated are proportionate to the rights and interests that were at stake.
This is a challenging, but perhaps refreshing comment from the bench.
We often hear of the "average" Canadian being driven out of the court system because of its prohibitive costs. Rarely do we consider the waste of judicial resources arising from dubious courtroom feuds among the well-heeled, who have little trouble affording the sport of unending litigation.
Should the public really be paying for this?
We often hear of the "average" Canadian being driven out of the court system because of its prohibitive costs. Rarely do we consider the waste of judicial resources arising from dubious courtroom feuds among the well-heeled, who have little trouble affording the sport of unending litigation.
Should the public really be paying for this?
More reading:
Defamation case involving diet doctors 'more about ego than injury' judge finds
Bernstein v. Poon 2015 ONSC 155 (CanLII) — 2015-01-19
Visit our Toronto Law Office website: www.wiselaw.net
No comments:
Post a Comment
Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post here. Comments are subject to the site's terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of Wise Law Blog and the writers thereof. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed without notification.