A fascinating discussion at Volokh: Could O.J.'s Sentence for Robbery Take Into Account His Killings?
And given this finding about Simpson's past conduct and therefore his moral character, the judge would be legally allowed to impose a higher sentence than he would on a typical robber, burglar, or what have you. I'm not sure whether the judge in this case would indeed act this way; but the federal Constitution would let him act this way if he so chose.
The post's comments are particularly enlightening - about readers' attitudes and the law.
And forgive one small note on the quote above - the presiding judge, Judge Jackie Glass, is a she, not a he.
- Garry J. Wise, Toronto
Visit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net
EMPLOYMENT LAW • CIVIL LITIGATION • WILLS AND ESTATES • FAMILY LAW & DIVORCE
ORIGINALLY POSTED AT WISE LAW BLOG • SUBSCRIBE TO WISE LAW BLOG
1 comment:
Technically, this conviction related to the killings were civil convictions. Essentially, Simpson will be a first time convicted criminal. I could be wrong, but I don't see the judge giving him a life sentence. I picture about 10 to 15 years. Then again, in the States, the judges do tend to give very long sentences. Simpson could get 100 years which is practically a life sentence.
Post a Comment