Who started it?
- Garry J. Wise, Toronto
Visit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net
EMPLOYMENT LAW • CIVIL LITIGATION • WILLS AND ESTATES • FAMILY LAW & DIVORCE
ORIGINALLY POSTED AT WISE LAW BLOG • SUBSCRIBE TO WISE LAW BLOG
Who started it?
- Garry J. Wise, Toronto
Visit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net
EMPLOYMENT LAW • CIVIL LITIGATION • WILLS AND ESTATES • FAMILY LAW & DIVORCE
ORIGINALLY POSTED AT WISE LAW BLOG • SUBSCRIBE TO WISE LAW BLOG
Posted by
@wiselaw
on
Friday, October 23, 2009
2
comments
Labels: Barack Obama, Bill O'Reilly, Fox News, Glen Beck, US politics
A New York Times article contends that News Corp. and General Electric executives imposed an end to the vaunted cable news feud between Fox's Bill O'Reilly and MSNBC's Keith Olbermann:
“For this war to stop, it meant fewer headaches on the corporate side,” one employee said.
- Garry J. Wise, Toronto
Update: August 7, 2009
... maybe not. Olbermann refuses to play.
Visit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net
EMPLOYMENT LAW • CIVIL LITIGATION • WILLS AND ESTATES • FAMILY LAW & DIVORCE
ORIGINALLY POSTED AT WISE LAW BLOG • SUBSCRIBE TO WISE LAW BLOG
Posted by
@wiselaw
on
Saturday, August 01, 2009
0
comments
Labels: Bill O'Reilly, Fox News, Keith Olbermann, MSNBC
From a fascinating and insightful profile of MSNBC's Keith Olbermann by Peter J. Boyer in the New Yorker:
The Olbermann-O’Reilly feud, which is wholly Olbermann’s creation, began with a wisecrack in 2003, the first year of “Countdown.” It evolved after Olbermann instituted a farcical segment called “The Worst Person in the World,” in which O’Reilly, depicted as a pompous buffoon, was regularly cited. O’Reilly, the biggest draw of the highest-rated cable-news network, could only lose by engaging with Olbermann, but he could not resist. Refusing to mention Olbermann by name, he sponsored a petition drive to have him replaced, and eventually began to aim on-air broadsides against NBC’s parent company, General Electric, and its chairman, Jeffrey Immelt. “If my child were killed in Iraq, I would blame the likes of Jeffrey Immelt,” O’Reilly asserted in April, citing G.E.’s business relationship with Iran. (The company began phasing out its contracts there in 2005.) This only encouraged Olbermann, who subjected Bill-O (as Olbermann calls him) to near-daily barrages of acid caricature. Instead of using video clips of O’Reilly for his routines, Olbermann began voicing O’Reilly’s words himself, in a demonic mimicry of the Ted Baxter character on “The Mary Tyler Moore Show.”
See: One Angry Man: Is Keith Olbermann changing TV news?
- Garry J. Wise, Toronto
Visit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net
EMPLOYMENT LAW • CIVIL LITIGATION • WILLS AND ESTATES • FAMILY LAW & DIVORCE
ORIGINALLY POSTED AT WISE LAW BLOG • SUBSCRIBE TO WISE LAW BLOG
Posted by
@wiselaw
on
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
0
comments
Labels: 2008 Presidential Election, Bill O'Reilly, Hillary Clinton, Keith Olbermann, media
- Garry J. Wise, Toronto
Visit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net
EMPLOYMENT LAW • CIVIL LITIGATION • WILLS AND ESTATES • FAMILY LAW & DIVORCE
ORIGINALLY POSTED AT WISE LAW BLOG • SUBSCRIBE TO WISE LAW BLOG
Posted by
@wiselaw
on
Saturday, May 03, 2008
0
comments
Labels: 2008 Presidential Election, Bill O'Reilly, Hillary Clinton
- Garry J. Wise, Toronto
Visit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net
EMPLOYMENT LAW • CIVIL LITIGATION • WILLS AND ESTATES • FAMILY LAW & DIVORCE
Posted by
@wiselaw
on
Sunday, March 09, 2008
0
comments
Labels: Bill O'Reilly
Three interesting stories came to my attention today about bloggers and the law.
In the cases below, we'll canvas situations in which legitimate bloggers have, respectively:
In each of these recent instances, a blogger stuck his or her proverbial neck out, and faced some fairly serious ramifications. All involve efforts, legal or extra-legal, to suppress free expression by bloggers and by extension, free speech on blogs, generally.
Of equal importance, each of these bloggers stuck to his or her guns, and refused to back down.
There is much debate about whether bloggers are really journalists, at all.
My view is that while this clearly varies from blog to blog, with many in the gray zone, serious bloggers undoubtedly must address many of the same concerns, liabilities and challenges that professional journalists face on a daily basis.
The law will confont this gray zone, increasingly, as the blogosphere's influence expands and citizen journalism's legitimacy and power become more firmly entrenched.
Blogging is not without its risks - or its principles.
I'll probably have much more to say on this topic in the future, but for now, that's the short-form.
So let's take a look at the cases....
.....
Court Protects Identity of Anonymous Blogger
A New York Superior Court Judge has refused a petition for an order that Google disclose the name of the anonymous blogger who writes the "infamous" Orthomom blog.
(That's Ortho, as in Orthodox Jewish Mom, in case you were wondering).
Robert Ambrogi's law blog reports on the case:
The petitioner, Pamela Greenbaum, a school board member in Lawrence, N.Y., brought a pre-action discovery proceeding seeking to force Google to disclose the author of the blog Orthomom, which Google hosts on its Blogger service
In a decision issued Oct. 23, Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Marcy Friedman concluded that Greenbaum had not shown that she has a meritorious claim for defamation and therefore is not entitled to disclosure of the blogger's identity. Friedman wrote:
[T]he court ... finds that Orthomom's statements are not reasonably susceptible of a defamatory connotation. Greenbaum's defamation claim against Orthomom reduces to the insupportable assertion that Orthomom implied that Greenbaum is an anti-semite merely because Orthomom disagreed with Greenbaum's position on the use of public funding for a program that could have affected the Orthodox Jewish community.
Because the blogger was expressing her opinion about a fact that was not in dispute, her statement was protected by the First Amendment, the judge said.
Orthomom, herself, commented on the ultimate dismissal of the case against her:
I guess Ms. Greenbaum should have considered being a little less sensitive to the criticisms of her policies as she saw them on these pages. It would seem to me that her attempts to muzzle me and my commenters from disagreeing with her actions as an elected official have potentially bought her a far bigger headache that any of the original comments in question may have brought on.
She also comments here:
The bottom line here is that this failed attempt to quell free speech has instead served to reaffirm the First Amendment right or each one of us to speak freely without fear of retribution or ramifications. The fact that a public official attempted to muzzle vocal critic of her policies by filing a meritless suit that included false claims and smears against my truthfulness is appalling - and the judge's decision clearly shows that the law is against such attempts. The fact that in the process, Ms. Greenbaum succeeded only in publicly smearing her own reputation and integrity is gravy.
.....
Trademark - Use of Logo on Blog
Web Pro News details the clash between U.S. law blogger Eric Turkewitz and car rental company Avis.
Avis objected to Turkewitz' use of the Avis logo on his blog, New York Personal Injury Law Blog.
The logo image was used by Turkewitz to add a topical, graphic touch to a blog entry entitled Car Rental Immunity Law Held Unconstitutional By Federal Judge.
Avis subsequently demanded that the image be removed:
We have the greatest respect for your right to express your opinions on your blog, but that does not include the right to use Avis' trademark as you have done in this particular piece.
Understandably, trademark law is not within your area of expertise. Therefore, we trust that this was done out of ignorance and not based on an intent to misuse our mark to the benefit of your personal injury practice.
We ask that you remove it immediately and refrain from any similar use in the future.
Turkewitz responded:
Having thought about the issue, and discussed it privately with some, and seen public comment from others... I am at a loss to figure out exactly how your trademark claim trumps my free speech rights. Since, as you believe, trademark law is not within my area of expertise, and that I am simply ignorant, perhaps now is the time for you to set forth exactly how and why I should surrender my constitutional rights to your company.
So send me a proper cease and desist letter. Set forth for me with specificity your claims of legal superiority. You now have the opportunity to demonstrate your expertise and analysis in this arena since I, as you indicate, am simply too ignorant to know it myself.
Until you do that, however, I will assume your threat is an empty attempt to bully and intimidate. And so, the mark remains on my original post.
......
Fox News - Intimidation of Blogger by Complaint to His Law School
Finally, Raw Story reports that Fox network Vice President Dianne Brandi has allegedly written to the dean of the University of Virginia's law school, urging an investigation into the conduct of blogger Mike Stark.
Stark is a second year law student at Virginia, and operates a liberal blog, Calling All Wingnuts. He is somewhat notorious for his aggressive criticism of controversial Fox broadcaster Bill O'Reilly.
In her letter to the law school, Brandi allegedly accuses Stark of "violating the university's codes of conduct," and asserts insultingly that Stark "would have trouble passing the fitness review required for admission to the bar."
According to Raw Story:
The showdown began with Stark's calls to O'Reilly's radio show -- "telling the truth when he didn't want to talk about the truth," as Stark characterizes it -- and escalated to a videotaped confrontation in O'Reilly's driveway.
Brandi claimed the visit amounted to harassment, but Stark said he sees it as a reasonable response after O'Reilly sent a producer to the home of Jet Blue CEO David Neeleman when the airline sponsored this summer's YearlyKos conference of progressive bloggers and activists.
O'Reilly made YearlyKos one of his favorite targets in August, when he smeared the conference's namesake blog, Daily Kos, with a few offensive comments dredged from the thousands posted by readers every day. Stark accosted O'Reilly at his Manhasset, NY, home and implored him to "stop lying" about the blog. He also distributed copies of a 3-year-old sexual harassment lawsuit filed against O'Reilly to his neighbors and displayed signs branding the host a pervert -- actions some say cross ethical boundaries.
While Stark is hardly blameless, the Fox effort to undermine his future and livelihood by attacking his tenure as a law student certainly casts a new highlight on the protections journalists require from retaliatory actions that could have a chilling effect upon the press.
In this case, however, it is the press itself that has apparently engaged in bullying tactics to intimidate a rather vocal critic.
Thumbs way down, Fox News.
- Garry J. Wise, Toronto
Visit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net
EMPLOYMENT LAW • CIVIL LITIGATION • WILLS AND ESTATES • FhAMILY LAW & DIVORCE
Posted by
@wiselaw
on
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
0
comments
Labels: Avis, Bill O'Reilly, blawgs, blogs, free speech. Fox News, law blogs, media, Trademark
Separation and Divorce In Ontario - An Introduction to Family Law
Wills and Powers of Attorney for Care - The Basics of Estate Planning in Ontario
FOR LAWYERS:
Untangling Web 2.0 - A Survival Guide for (Modern) Legal Professionals
Punitive Damages in Ontario Employment Law - Pate Estate v. Galway-Cavendish and Harvey (Township)
Money Mart Ordered to Pay $30K for Harassment
The Ontario Human Rights Tribunal has ordered National Money Mart Company to pay $30,000 in compensation to a former, one-year employee of the company who had been subjected to ongoing, serious sexual harassment by her workplace supervisor.
Workplace Harrassment and Bil 168 - A New Remedy for an Old Problem
Workplace bullying is a serious problem for thousands of Canadians at work. It can degrade one’s self worth and create serious health problems for workers and their families.
There has often been very little that could be done to stop the workplace bully in his or her tracks. But, in Ontario, there is now hope around the corner.
The Future of Wallace Damages in Ontario Employment Law
Family Law Change Comes to Ontario
Bill 133, Ontario's Family Statute Law Amendment Act, 2009, was carried in its Third Reading on May 7, 2009. The Bill enacts significant amendments to Ontario's family law regime.
Wise Law Blog features timely articles on legal developments in Canada and the United States, along with commentary on Canadian politics, American politics, technology and noteworthy current affairs.
Launched on April 5, 2005, Wise Law Blog also highlights key decisions of Canadian courts, with focus on Ontario Family Law, Ontario Employment Law and other areas of interest.
Garry J. Wise is primary contributor to Wise Law Blog. He is a Canadian litigation lawyer who practices with Wise Law Office,Toronto. He is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School and was called to the Ontario Bar in 1986.
Garry's colleagues at Wise Law, as well as occasional guest bloggers, also contribute to Wise Law Blog.
Statutes of Canada
Statutes of Ontario
Ontario Superior Court of Justice: Rulings
Court of Appeal for Ontario: Rulings
Ontario Employment Standards Act
Canada Labour Code
Ontario Family Law Act
Divorce Act - Canada
Ontario Children's Law Reform Act
Canada Child Support Guidelines Lookup
Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
The articles and comments on Wise Law Blog are intended to provide general information on current issues and developments in the law. They are not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should not rely upon or act on information in this, or any blog without seeking legal advice as to the matters of specific concern to them. No solicitor and client relationship is created or can be created by accessing, reading or commenting upon any post at this site.
Wise Law Blog is not responsible for and does not necessarily agree with the contents of comments posted by readers of this blog. Such comments represent the personal views of the commenters only, and are included on this blog in the interest of promoting public discourse and a free exchange of ideas. We reserve the right to decline or delete any comment posted on this site which we, in our sole and absolute discretion, deem inappropriate for publication on this site.

Legal Ethics in an Age of Technology
OMG!Law Talk Episode 2
OMG! Law Talk Episode 1
In Conversation with LexBlog's Kevin O'Keefe - Part I
In Conversation with LexBlog's Kevin O'Keefe - Part II