Showing posts with label India. Show all posts
Showing posts with label India. Show all posts

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Legal Outsourcing

Financial Post's Julius Melnitzer writes on the growing trend of outsourcing legal work to India, after a decision by international mining giant, Rio Tinto, to do just that with its corporate-commercial legal work:

"It won't be long before inhouse departments start looking at the elements of even the largest transactions that are amenable to outsourcing," says Carla Swansburg, president of the Association of Corporate Counsel's Ontario chapter and senior counsel at Royal Bank at Canada. "I'm thinking things like due diligence, contract review, data collection, legal research and lease abstracting."

This type of thinking could spell the beginning of the end for the highly leveraged, associate-hour-heavy work that makes up so much of law firms' prized transactions.

...No one, including Rio's Ms. Cooper, denies the risks involved in outsourcing. But Ms. Swansburg, who worked at Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt and Ogilvy Renault before going in-house, says lawyers and clients diverge in their evaluation of the risks.

"The law firms almost always wave flags about quality and control, but their mistake is that they approach risk calculation in an extremely different way from in-house counsel," she says. "In-house counsel, whose budgets are being squeezed so hard, can't afford a zero-tolerance approach and they're being asked to analyze the cost-benefit equation much more closely these days.""

See the full story: Outsourcing is Taking Hold.

Rio Tinto decribes itself as "a leading international mining group, combining Rio Tinto plc, a London listed public company headquartered in the UK, and Rio Tinto Limited, which is listed on the Australian Stock Exchange, with executive offices in Melbourne."

- Shashi K. Raina, Toronto

Visit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net

EMPLOYMENT LAWCIVIL LITIGATIONWILLS AND ESTATESFAMILY LAW & DIVORCE

ORIGINALLY POSTED AT WISE LAW BLOGSUBSCRIBE TO WISE LAW BLOG

Thursday, March 19, 2009

India's Caste System Challenged in Appeal Court Ruling

For those of us who know very little about the state of social justice in India, this report from Telegraph UK will be most disconcerting:

Mushtaq Ahmed Mir, an unemployed man from Kupwara, decided to sue the Kashmiri newspaper Tameel-i-Irshad after it published a false report claiming he was a defendant in a murder case. He had asked the judge to waive the court fee in the case because he was too poor to pay it.

The judge threw out his case with a ruling that the poor did not have reputations which could be damaged in newspaper reports.

"When the plaintiff is not even in a position to pay the lawsuit fee, he cannot seek damages for defamation, " Judge Nazir Ahmed Fida said. "The dignity of a person of low integrity will not be lowered further in case his name appears in a defamatory piece of news."

...In his appeal ruling, High Court Judge Muzaffar Hussain Attar reprimanded the original trial judge and said his ruling had been "offensive to conscience." "The respect and reputation of a person is not dependent upon how much wealth he has accumulated," he said. If only the rich were entitled to respect "a great disservice will be done to society," he added.

...Leading social commentator Pavan K Varma said the ruling heralded "the beginning of change." "To say that someone who is poor can't have status reflects the mindset of another century, but old attitudes die hard. That the appeals judge threw out the ruling means there's a beginning of change. I'm not surprised that [the judgment] was overruled. That's the significance. Caste is now standing on its head," he said.

- Garry J. Wise, Toronto

Visit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net

EMPLOYMENT LAWCIVIL LITIGATIONWILLS AND ESTATESFAMILY LAW & DIVORCE

ORIGINALLY POSTED AT WISE LAW BLOGSUBSCRIBE TO WISE LAW BLOG

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Legal Outsourcing to India

In the not too distant past, when people in the west thought of India, they thought of a country of sadhus, snake-charmers and saris; a country of tigers and elephants, poverty and congestion.

Those images are still very much a part of popular western perceptions of India.

But something has changed.

Discussion today on India is just as likely to be about the four Indian billionaires in the world's top ten list. Or the many Indian companies that have gone global with acquisitions all over the world, including Europe and North America.

Mostly though, when it comes to India, the subject now on most westerners' minds is outsourcing.

India has emerged as an economic powerhouse in the service industry.

Outsourcing to India started in the early 1990’s with medical transcription being the first known outsourced service. However, it is the IT and call centre outsourcing that really brought the Indian outsourcing industry into limelight. Today Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) Companies in India provide services in a wide spectrum of industries including call centre, data management, engineering, financial, healthcare and legal. The most recent addition appears to be reproductive outsourcing.

While Legal Outsourcing to India appears to be relatively new phenomenon, some US law firms have been outsourcing their patent work to India since as early as 1996.

Today outsourcing legal work to India is no longer a novelty. It's a reality which more and more corporations and law firms are exploring as a cost saving measure.

Legal Process Outsourcing (LPO) as it is called now got a big boost when corporate legal departments started to outsource their in-house legal work. The big US corporate names that have outsourced legal work to India in one form or another other include General Electric, Microsoft and American Express.

While the typical services provided by Indian LPO firms started with paralegal, secretarial, and litigation support work, however, Indian firms are now reportedly offering more valuable services, including contract review and monitoring, document review for due diligence, patent drafting, simple filings and legal research.

Anthony Lin of New York Law Journal, in his story on LAW.COM, says:

Legal process outsourcing vendors target the more mundane but nonetheless time-intensive tasks associated with legal practice, reviewing mountains of documents for discovery rather than drafting appellate briefs. Once the province of junior associates, such work is now more commonly handled by domestic staffing agencies fielding large teams of temporary attorneys.

While critics say that Indian lawyers can fulfill only the functions of paralegals and very junior associates, AsiaLaw.com reports that some LPO firms are trying to move up the value chain to more complex tasks, and the prospect of higher-value work has fuelled a surge in the number of
Indian firms eager to take on corporate outsourcing.

However, the fact remains that top-tier Indian law firms have largely shunned off shoring contracts who say they won’t be tempted until high-value services can engage their interest.

India has huge potential in legal outsourcing, with more than 200,000 Indians graduating from law schools each year. These English-speaking modestly paid lawyers familiar with common law principles offer significant value to foreign companies to reduce in-house legal costs. On top of everything else, the time difference of about 12 hours allow for overnight and 24X7 operations.

According to Lin:

LPO salaries for Indian lawyers are generally well below $10,000 a year. By comparison, a U.S. contract lawyer usually earns around $30 an hour while associate base salaries at major firms in New York start at $160,000 a year.

But the math is not that simple. Maintaining a group of lawyers in India imposes significant infrastructure costs on the outsourcing companies. Aside from office space and computers, the leading companies also have U.S.-trained lawyers working in both India and the United States to supervise the work of Indian staff. They also maintain client development teams to market services to U.S. companies.

Such costs explain why outsourcing companies usually charge clients around $30 an hour, lower than what a U.S. staffing agency would generally charge but not by the magnitude simple labor-cost arbitrage would suggest.

Where does Canada stand in all this action?

According to National Post, Canadian lawyers are also looking to India to lower costs. In a story “Service brings India to Canada's lawyers” the newspaper reported on the official launch of Legalwise, believed to be the first homegrown outsourcing firm that uses Indian lawyers to carry out assignments under the guidance of Canadian lawyers.

It is the brainchild of Toronto lawyer Gavin Birer, a former Bay Street corporate lawyer and former vice-president of legal and business affairs at Travelex Americas, a non-bank foreign-exchange firm.

"Clients are becoming more aware of the type of legal services they are getting and the costs associated with that," he said.

"We are not a law firm, we don't provide legal advice," explained Mr. Birer, noting his firm works with a team of 430 lawyers based in Mumbai and Pune, who are trained in common law principles, similar to Canada. Legalwise works with lawyers here to identify projects that can be tasked to India. That includes litigation and corporate commercial services, such things as legal research, document review and drafting, contract management, lease abstracting, and due diligence. "It's the lower end of the legal spectrum," he said.

The Canadian Corporate Counsel Association last year found that keeping costs down was the number two priority -- after keeping up with the volume of work -- among 32% of in-house lawyers it surveyed.

A 1,500-hour project would costs $375,000 if carried out here by a $250-an-hour junior lawyer. In India, the same job would be $50 an hour for a total project cost of $75,000 --a savings of $300,000.

With the potential for cost savings so huge, the gold rush is on. More LPO firms are mushrooming everyday, spinning up the competition for talent. Lin says:

As a result, many companies have turned away from the big cities like Mumbai, where real estate costs can be as high as in U.S. cities. British firm NewGalexy Partners opened an office in the smaller Indian city of Pune for that reason.

Opening in a smaller market was the only way to meet U.S. and European clients' expectation on costs and service.You can't do that in a major Indian city anymore. The labor supply is finite.

The other threat to the outsourcing industry in India is the possibility of opening of the Indian legal market to foreign competition, which has been on the cards for a few years now. Such a move would affect the ability of LPO firms to recruit top candidates, as foreign firms would likely be able to pay even higher salaries.

It may well be that as in the IT sector, at some point of time in the future companies and law firms may have to look for alternative offshore outsourcing locations.

The financial benefits of outsourcing are not necessarily without risks and challenges.

Worries over issues related to confidential information and lawyer-client privilege are common. People are concerned about someone who’s not a part of their company or law firm, particularly a non-lawyer, who is not bound by the same rules of ethics as lawyers in US and Canada, having access to confidential information.

These types of concerns are usually addressed with strict contracts. Some outsourcing contracts are reported to specify that off-shore lawyers' computers could only have limited access to the Internet to prevent the inadvertent disclosure of documents.

Outsourcing is also perceived as a long-term threat to the traditional on-the-job training system for new lawyers. The traditional routine jobs given to lawyers when starting out are essentially the jobs that are being outsourced. Firms could find that while they are saving money outsourcing, their young lawyers are not getting properly trained.

Further, there will obviously be loss of jobs here in North America, however it is no longer considered to be a serious concern. In the 2004 US Presidential Election Campaign, loss of US jobs to offshore locations such as India was a political hot potato. Not in the present election campaign.

The fact remains that offshore outsourcing has become an ongoing and long-term economic reality.

Today IT professionals from North America and Europe work in cities like Bangalore and Hyderabad in India.

Who knows, some years down the road, lawyers from this continent may be looking for jobs in India...

- Shashi K. Raina, Toronto


Visit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net

EMPLOYMENT LAWCIVIL LITIGATIONWILLS AND ESTATESFAMILY LAW & DIVORCE