Showing posts with label YouTube. Show all posts
Showing posts with label YouTube. Show all posts

Friday, October 07, 2011

Video: Legal Ethics in an Age of Technology

Legal Ethics in an Age of Technology...

That sounds a wee bit lofty, no?

Some of you are probably thinking, “Ethics?  We're talking about Facebook and Twitter, here, right?” Well as you will see in this video, the more involved a legal professional gets in social media, the more likely it is that an ethical question might just fall into his or her lap...


This video was originally presented at a Law Society of Upper Canada Continuing Professional Development Webinar, "Ethical Considerations in the Age of Technology" on October 7, 2011.

Join us on November 21, 2011 for Round II of our panel discussion with Bob Tarantino, Mitch Kowalski, Omar Ha-Redeye and yours very truly.  Register here.

- Garry J. Wise, Toronto
Visit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net

Friday, December 17, 2010

Transformative Work Enthusiasts Bolstered By "Yogi Bear" Parody Reaction

Today, a rare instance of Hollywood failing to overreact when defending its copyrights:
A video parody of “Yogi Bear” that’s much darker than your average episode of that vintage Hanna-Barbera cartoon – not to mention the coming Warner Brothers film adaptation – isn’t a viral marketing campaign gone awry. But the studio said on Monday that it wouldn’t try to take down the Web satire, either.
The video, posted on December 13th, is a well-made parody which sets Yogi and Boo Boo in a story that mirrors the end of the film The Assassination of Jesse James By The Coward Robert Ford. It has already generated almost two and a half million views since it was posted.

Many other viral Youtubes featuring corporate-owned properties like these are often taken down on the basis of copyright violation (which has led to amusing bits of confusion such as Sony temporarily forcing Youtube to remove access to Beyonce songs - from Beyonce's own channel). Indeed, takedowns for copyright infringement range across all the creative industries, from comic-book scan sharers having their Livejournal accounts nuked to the Department of Homeland Security shutting down hip-hop sites.

Although many have argued that owners of copyrighted work should consider a more liberal approach to dealing with infringement of that copyright - or that they should reconsider their distribution models to make on-demand access to the material easier to discourage infringement - this argument has been going on since the age of bootlegged music in the 70s and 80s.

What makes Warner Brothers' action worthy of note is that this action is not in response to copyright infringement through basic reproduction of the work, but in response to a transformative use of the work; copyright reform advocates have long argued that transformative use and "remix culture" should be considered protected under fair use/fair dealing law, since they use existing elements of copyright works to create new works which should then receive their own individual copyright.

Warner's statement that taking action against the short's creators would be difficult under existing fair use law is, in that light, an admission that they believe transformative works stand a good chance of ultimately being found allowable as a fair use of existing copyright. That should be encouraging for those of us who want to make parody Youtube videos - and those of us who enjoy watching them.
-Christopher Bird, Toronto
Visit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net

Saturday, October 02, 2010

Social Media and the Legal Profession: Where are We Today?

Toronto green energy and business lawyer Robert J. Wakulat will be speaking next week on the topic of social media and the practice of law at the International Bar Association Annual Conference in Vancouver. He's kindly asked for views from colleagues on the current state of the social media universe and the legal profession.

These were my thoughts:

Which social media tool has been most/least useful to you? Why?
  • From my perspective, it is no longer about which of the social media options is most useful. Our firm has a presence on most of the more popular platforms already, and they all have their places.
  • As I see it, one of the current challenges in social media for lawyers is integration. Once you have a website and blog, are on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube, Digg, etc., how do you tie it all together - with the least amount of extra hands-on effort - into a cohesive, seamless and consistent presence that establishes a brand or identity that is both authentic and digestible for readers?
  • There are lots of widgets that that utilize RSS to interconnect these resources, needless to say, but I still see maximizing the cumulative benefit of them all as a challenge. I've tried to use Wise Law Blog as a central hub to do this, but don't think that is the final answer. I will likely continue to work on better ways to accomplish this.
As a lawyer, do you find you give special consideration to how you use various social media tools?
  • Lawyers need to be very conscious of the "voice" we use online. Among other things, we must satisfy our regulators, speak to our intended audiences in their own language, and accomplish our own personal and professional goals, as we define them.
  • I've never had a struggle on this, but over time, I've certainly chosen to avoid a few hot buttons in my writing. Needless to say, online, those who disagree can be quite robust! I've not generally found engaging them to be time well spent.
How has any social media changed aspects of your practice? (Administration, marketing, client communication, other.)
  • I've long contended that the web and social media are the legal profession's great equalizer, allowing smaller firms to cost-effectively reach out to very large audiences, and to thereby compete globally with great success.
  • Done well, a law firm's web presence can become a magnet that attracts clients, interest from the press, CLE speaking opportunities, qualified job applicants, and overall, generates enhanced professional profile.
  • Beyond that, the available information resources at CanLii, government web sites, Canada's many exceptional law blogs, and of course, Google (to name only a few), have brought instant information to our fingertips, making us - and our clients - a whole lot smarter.
  • Having started my own law practice in 1986 (that's a while ago...), I can speak at great length as to the impact of the web and social media on my firm.
  • Bottom line - it's a very different world with new opportunity I couldn't previously have imagined.
Do you see a difference in the way Small Law vs Big Law uses social media?
  • Smaller firms were probably the profession's pioneers in leveraging the web.
  • Big firms are catching up, but they have a long way to go.
  • In spite of the copious money they are now throwing at their online endeavours, the best larger firms can likely hope for is the protection of their own, customary turf. Theirs is a defensive effort to stave off the various, serious challenges that have now emerged.
  • The "Big Law" marketplace has possibly shrunk permanently. Smaller firms may well have a decade ahead of yet-untapped potential.
For some of my earlier thoughts related to social media and the practice of law, see the following papers, written for previous CLE programmes:
- Garry J. Wise, Toronto
Visit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

Learning the 'Power of The Internet' (The Hard Way)

CBC reports on David Fraser, one of three hunters whose illegal duck-shooting escapades garnered You Tube fame - and a $5,000.00 fine in a Saskatchewan court, after pleading guilty to hunting law violations:

Fraser said he also learned a lot about the power of the internet and about exercising extra caution when posting to social networking sites.

"Because anyone that puts anything on the internet, you're exposing yourselves and you can get yourself into trouble like we did," Fraser said. "It's embarrassing, what I did, and I'm very ashamed of the way I acted."

When asked by a reporter whether he thought the matter had been blown out of proportion, Fraser responded, "Absolutely."

- Garry J. Wise, Toronto

Visit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net

EMPLOYMENT LAWCIVIL LITIGATIONWILLS AND ESTATESFAMILY LAW & DIVORCE

ORIGINALLY POSTED AT WISE LAW BLOGSUBSCRIBE TO WISE LAW BLOG

Thursday, May 28, 2009

Esquire's Worst Lawyer Ads Ever

Seeing is believing. 

More at Esquire's Five Lawyer Ads That Make Any Supreme Court Candidate Look Brilliant:


- Garry J. Wise, Toronto

Visit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net

EMPLOYMENT LAWCIVIL LITIGATIONWILLS AND ESTATESFAMILY LAW & DIVORCE

ORIGINALLY POSTED AT WISE LAW BLOGSUBSCRIBE TO WISE LAW BLOG

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

Divorce By YouTube

We've written previously on the troubling emergence of the "divorce blog,"

These are web logs in which a divorcing spouse typically airs the family's "dirty laundry" online, often in a running commentary, for all to see.

Tricia Walsh-Smith, one of the protagonists in a bitter Broadway divorce-in-progress, has now taken this disturbing trend up several notches.

She has brought her grievances to the nation - via YouTube:

CNN has the story:

Some prominent New York divorce lawyers couldn't think of another case where a spouse -- in this instance, the wife of a major Broadway theater operator -- had taken to YouTube to spill the secrets of a marriage in an apparent effort to gain leverage and humiliate the other side.

"This is absolutely a new step, and I think it's scary," said Bonnie Rabin, a divorce lawyer who has handled high-profile cases. "People used to worry about getting on Page Six [the gossip page of the New York Post]. But this? It brings the concept of humiliation to a whole new level."

In a tearful and furious YouTube video with close to 150,000 hits to date, former actress and playwright ("Bonkers") Tricia Walsh-Smith lashes out against her husband, Philip Smith, president of the Shubert Organization, the largest theater owner on Broadway,

She goes through their wedding album on camera, describing family members as "bad" or "evil" or "nasty," and talks about how her husband is allegedly trying to evict her from their luxury apartment. She also makes embarrassing claims regarding their intimate life, and then calls his office on camera to repeat those claims to a stunned assistant .

- Garry J. Wise, Toronto

Visit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net

EMPLOYMENT LAWCIVIL LITIGATIONWILLS AND ESTATESFAMILY LAW & DIVORCE

ORIGINALLY POvSTED AT WISE LAW BLOGSUBSCRIBE TO WISE LAW BLOG

Saturday, February 16, 2008

Who Will Police the Police?

We are seeing far too many of these kinds of incidents.

Baltimore:

Vancouver Island:



Hillsborough County, Florida:

- Garry J. Wise, Toronto

Visit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net

EMPLOYMENT LAWCIVIL LITIGATIONWILLS AND ESTATESFAMILY LAW & DIVORCE

Wednesday, November 07, 2007

The Eagles: How Long

Following up on our previous post on The Eagles new album, Long Road Out of Eden, here is How Long, a track from the album via YouTube.

The sound on this tune is as "vintage" as it gets - kind of like Take it Easy meets Already Gone:

Here's a second version of the same song, live from the CMA Awards last evening (h/t Jeralyn):



On the Eagles news front, not only has the new album sold over 700,00 copies in its first week and knocked Britney Spears from the number 1 spot on Billboard's charts.

The group's exclusive retail distribution deal with Wal*Mart has caused Billboard to change a long-standing policy against charting projects that are sold only in single retail outlets.

Entertainment Weekly reports:

According to a press release, "Billboard will now allow exclusive album titles that are only available through one retailer to appear on The Billboard 200 and other Billboard charts," effective pronto.

Now, certain people will celebrate Billboard's change of heart as a victory for classic California rock over ultra-synthetic, producer-based teen pop. Others may view it as a simple triumph of age over beauty. And some may even take it as a comforting reaffirmation of their faith in charts. Me, I can't help but see it as testimony to the undeniable market dominance of Wal-Mart.

- Garry J. Wise, Toronto

Visit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net

EMPLOYMENT LAWCIVIL LITIGATIONWILLS AND ESTATESFAMILY LAW & DIVORCE

Tuesday, November 06, 2007

YouTube Canada

CBC reports that YouTube.ca has arrived.

Luis Garcia, international product manager for YouTube, said the content on both YouTube.com and YouTube.ca will be the same, but the new site will promote Canadian submissions.

The only thing that's different is that this is just a Canadian lens into that content, so if a user wants to get the Canada point of view into that global body of content, then they're able to do that.

(Although I just went to YouTube.ca, and it seemed only to redirect to YouTube.com).

UPDATE: November 7, 2007 - YouTube Canada gets failing grade from some - see: YouTube Rubs Canada Wrong Way

- Garry J. Wise, Toronto

Visit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net

EMPLOYMENT LAWCIVIL LITIGATIONWILLS AND ESTATESFAMILY LAW & DIVORCE